The “Standard Review” service resembles the official review process and provides a detailed report about the way the project is presented. It includes a single review cycle followed by a question and answer session.
The ERC Standard Review service:
During the ERC Standard Review process, our team will thoroughly review the application to verify that all essential elements and requirements of ERC are properly addressed. The feedback that we provide serves as a pre-submission validation and can be used to improve the proposal’s readiness prior to actual submission. To maximize the effectiveness of this service, it is highly recommended to submit a near-final version of your application, so that the single review cycle and the Q&A session which follows will be as extensive and exhaustive as possible.
The outcome of our Standard Review is a detailed report which covers both technical and conceptual aspects of your proposal.
The conceptual aspects we cover include, but are not limited to:
- Novelty
- Ambitiousness and conceptual risk
- State of the art presentation / literature review
- Research objectives
- Hypothesis-driven research / Theoretical framework
- Incremental work
- High Gain and impact
- Open-ended research
- FragmentationMethodology and research plan
- Feasibility of the scientific approach
- Risk assessment and contingency plans
- The PI’s unique position to lead this project
- Collaborations
The conceptual aspects we’ll cover during this service include:
- Research objectives
- Novelty & high-risk
- High-gain
- Hypothesis-driven research
- Incremental work
- Risk assessment and scientific feasibility
- Open-end research
- Methodology and research plan
- Basic vs. applicative science
- Preliminary results vs. feasibility
- The PI’s unique position to lead this project
- Collaborations
The technical aspects we cover include, but are not limited to:
- Overall formatting, page limits, adherence to the template
- Any relevant eligibility issues
- Any errors that may lead to technical rejection
- Abstract
- CV and track record evaluation
- Budget and budget justification text
- PI’s time dedication
Interested in the ERC Standard Review for your research project?
*It is understood and agreed that the provided information must be kept confidential. Enspire Science does not disclose confidential information obtained.
David Henry
“Concise, well-directed advise. Incredibly efficient review turn-around!”
“It was prompt and to the point. I had all my questions answered in enough detail.”
Zbynek Heger
“Preparation of my ERC together with Enspire was a joyful experience. Our communication was fast and efficient, and helped me to markedly improve my project application (and importantly – to polish my research ideas). You guys are doing a great job – highly recommended!”
“The external vision provided by Enspire has been very valuable to open my mind on important aspects, like the perception of what is a challenge (in the ERC mind), what is the perception of visibility, leadership… The review is very detailed and I encourage everyone to benefit from this help. This is very complimentary from referee reports or the reading… Read more > “”
“I started with the go/no go review as I prepared for the 2019 StG call. I was amazed at how substantial even this service was and it was helpful in designing the proposal. Ultimately I made it to Step 2 but was not funded, so for the next round, I decided to get a standard review. The Enspire consultants really… Read more > “”
Athanasios Chatzitakis
“The review pinpointed all the weak points in my proposal. After that, I had a clear view of how to proceed with it. Moreover, I got good advice on choosing the most appropriate review panel. Overall, a very satisfying experience.”
Manuel Rivero Rodríguez
“They have conducted a very thorough analysis with many recommendations that have better targeted the proposal. In fact, although the project was intended for an Advance solicitation, their suggestions point to a more appropriate solicitation such as Sinergy.”
Would you like to learn more about this service?