Amin Mojiri
aviv "I received some great comments about improving risk/challenges and hypotheses during writing the proposal. I found how to connect the methodology with risk and hypotheses."
Katarzyna Krukiewicz
"I am very satisfied with the service provided by Enspire Science. I particularly appreciate the role of the consultant that I was working with, who helped me to significantly improve the scientific part of the proposal, and to present my track record from the best side. Even if my project...
"The feedback has been extremely useful to greatly improve my application. Of course sometimes the feedback is not what we want to hear, but in the end of the day that is exactly what I needed to push myself and to not be satisfied. There was so much room for...
"Working with Sharon was an amazing process. Her feedback was in-depth, detail-oriented, and critical; she just asked the kind of critical questions that I needed to hear in order to improve the application. For a first-time applicant it was invaluable for me to get a better grasp of ERC criteria...
"Enspire’s Deep dive review I has been an added value for applying to the ERC call. The help provided by their consultant has been crucial in the process of understanding the call’s rationale and its less intuitive peculiar aspects. I would definitely recommend their services!"
" The Deep dive review was excellent in combination with Enspires course on preparing for an ERC grant and the extensive online knowledge database. The intitial complementary review was very encouraging and already at that stage helped me start to re-formulate my research idea into a more competitive ERC application....
Theodossis Theodossiou
"The services of Enspire were of very high quality. The advisors are very experienced, and they were really attentive to detail. They provided me with great guidance in a grant scheme which I had no prior experience with. This helped my application become focused and to the point. The communication...
Josep Redon
"The contribution was realy good not only in formal issues but also in scientific and technical aspects."
Andreas Bikfalvi
"Very good interaction, strong criticism (which is good), helped me to shape my ideas about the project, very nice and helpful staff."
Ulf-Peter Apfel
"I received very critical feedback trying to disintegrate my entire proposal. Thanks for that. Only such a feedback is really valuable and helps to improve a proposal."